We recently received a very interesting and useful email from Harris Semi
concerning the HFA3624. Here is what they had to say:
Dear Spread Spectrum Scene,
Thank you for the review of the Harris Prism Chip Set in the Volume 5 -
Number 2 --Winter 1997 issue of the Internet Magazine entitled "Harris
PRISM Chipset Lessons Learned". I would like to respond to a couple of
the issues raised.
The HFA3624 RF/IF Converter evaluation board layout has been optimized
to maximize performance of the chip and was used extensively in the
evaluation of the part. This layout placed discrete components very
close to device leads and minimized trace lengths and parasitics. When
used with this fixture the device performs quite well, meeting all
specifications and having no observed oscillations. However, the
requirements of the PCMCIA board environment and surface mount component
pick and place machine ground rules place limitations on how close to
device leads or each other chip components can be placed. Harris' PCMCIA
reference design uses a 6 layer PCB with top layer dielectric thickness
of only 4 mils. Thin traces are required to minimize parasitic
capacitance to the buried ground layer, but this introduces trace
inductance.
The bottom line is that on several different PCMCIA board layouts, the
HFA3624 Down Converting Mixer has oscillated. A solution to this
oscillation is to add a series 22 ohm (0402) resistor close to the leads
of pins 23 and 24, the Receive Mixer IF outputs. The problem is that the
IF output transistors are meant to operate at the IF frequency, in this
case 280 MHz, but are in fact wide band transistors and some units
oscillate near 2xLO or 4.2 GHz. The series resistors provide isolation
to external parasitic loads at 4 GHz. At 280 MHz they appear as a small
resistance in series with a high impedance current source resulting in
negligible performance impact. This fix has been verified on several
different designs and work quite well.
Bob Rood
Wireless Applications
Harris Semiconductor
March 17, 1998
Even the HFA3924 RF Power Amplifier / Antenna Switch IC is far from perfect!
If you try to keep spectral sidelobe regeneration to a minimum, the maximum
power output that can be obtained from this part with a DBPSK or DQPSK signal
is on the order of 75 or 80 milliwatts! We spec'ed our sidelobe regeneration levels
by noting the -20 dB (or 99%) bandwidth of the DSSS drive signal and then
allowed the RF PA to increase this by a maximum of 10%. This is equivalent to
keeping IM levels between 27 and 30 dB down. The HFA3924 is also hard to
ground and bias. Every part we tried required "tweeking" the three negative bias
voltages for the stage drain recommended currents. Lot's of companies are building
GaAsFET power amps these days, both in MMIC form and discrete. I still prefer
discrete GaAsFET designs for power levels over about 100 milliwatts, because you
can optimize overall performance better with a discrete design. However, the
medium and higher power MMIC devices are coming along. Be careful on some of
these designs, however, because they may not operate well or with enough linearity
on a DSSS signal. The Pacific Monolithics PM2107, for instance, is great for CW
or constant envelope modulations, but it is very touchy if you want linear operation
and minimal DSSS sideband regeneration.
The HFA3424 LNA is an OK part -- it is just not very spectactular! It has only 12
to 15 dB gain, rather limited dynamic range and a not so great 2.3 dB noise figure.
There are lots of better LNAs out there at equal or better prices, to boot! Take a
look at Samsung's newest GaAsFET LNAs for some real performance in this slot!
In summary, stay away from the HFA3424, HFA3624 and the HFA3924. If you do --
you'll save a lot of time, trouble and money.
CONCLUSION:
Harris did a great job on the Core chips. I have heard that the 3724 and 3824 are
their own designs. I have also heard that the 3524 came from the the National
Semiconductor "Platinum" series of PLLs. The remaining chips seem to have
been specially developed by outside companies for Harris. Nothing personal Harris,
but I think you should stick to what you do best -- perhaps you should even make
public deals with other companies who have skills complementary to Harris'
strengths. That way your chipset can be sold exactly for what it is: a collection of
parts from several manufacturers.
Aside from these details, the Harris PRISM chipset is very good. It is well supported
by Harris. The evaluation board (see our companion article:
SS Evaluation Board and Software Comparison) hardware, software and documentation
is excellant.
Keep up the very good work Harris -- it really is appreciated! Try the PRISM chips,
they are some of the best devices out for any DSSS application.
If you have any questions, suggestions or need some help with your Harris PRISM
design just call on us at RF/SS -- we're here to help!
For more information on the Harris PRISM chipset, contact Harris directly:
Harris PRISM Chipset Introduction
Harris' PRISM Chipset
In October 2000, this website was purchased by
SSS Online, Inc. and is managed by Pegasus Technologies. For more of the best information
on RF/Spread Spectrum and wireless, press one of the buttons below:
|
|