Q. Dr. Zaghoul, it's a pleasure speaking with you today.
A. Thank you.
Q. What did you work on before inventing W-OFDM?
A. I was a senior researcher at Telus R&D working on digital communications projects
like helping in planning the transition from analog cellular to digital cellular. I also did a lot of
propagation channel measurements and analysis, and had contributed to a number of other inventions
like a novel equalizer and speech compression.
Q. What led to the development of W-OFDM?
A. When we invented what we thought was the best channel estimator for an adaptive equalizer, we
immediately applied it to the IS54, which was a TDMA digital cellular standard. The improvements
gained were much less than theoretically expected. The reason was that the design parameters
(like clock inaccuracy and drifts) caused more errors than the channel, at times. We decided to
figure out which communications system would not suffer as much from design issues and would best
suit the channel (this last criterion was novel), and the answer was W-OFDM.
Q. You hold some of the major patents on OFDM. Who are the other
major players in OFDM patents?
A. Philips holds a number of key patents in digital video broadcasting which is one way OFDM
is used. Philips represents the patent pool for DVB. TI holds a patent on discrete multitone,
which could be viewed as a variation of OFDM. CSIRO from Australia holds a patent on specific
indoor wireless LAN implementations. I have not reviewed the CSIRO patent in any detail yet.
Q. Wi-LAN calls its OFDM W-OFDM. There is a modulation technique for
digital television called COFDM. What are the similarities and differences between W-OFDM and
COFDM?
A. "C" stands for "coded". All OFDM nowadays is coded, so the "C"
is redundant. The "W" stands for wideband, or what is commonly called broadband.
We suggested different mechanisms to minimize channel and
system design effects to make two-way W-OFDM a reality. COFDM was chosen for digital TV
broadcasting in Europe; this is a one-way transmission where the cost of the transmitter
could have been in the $250k range and higher. We introduced tricks to bring this cost down
appreciably. I have not reviewed this in detail, but I personally am inclined to think that any
use of COFDM for two-way broadband wireless communications would infringe on our patent.
Q. What were the technological breakthroughs that made OFDM
practical?
A. The introduction of channel estimation as a rule, introduction of design criteria that made
broadband OFDM possible, introduction of phase whitening to reduce the peak-to-average ratio and
hence to reduce the requirement for linear amplifiers, and ASIC developments -- all these made
W-OFDM practical.
Q. Are your FFTs implemented in hardware or in programmable
processors?
A. We have implementations in both. Customer Premise Equipment would have to be in ASICs for
cost reasons.
Q. I believe that you use 16-QAM as the form of modulation on each of
the subcarriers. Could you use a higher order of modulation to get even higher data
rates?
A. We now have 64 QAM and are working on higher levels.
Q. The FCC has said that OFDM is not a form of direct sequence
spread spectrum. Do you agree?
A. No, I don't agree. OFDM and multicode direct sequence spread spectrum converge
when you use all possible codes for a single transmitter.
Q. You have petitioned the FCC to allow OFDM at 2.4 GHz under 15.247
for spread spectrum. Why?
A. We believe that allowing higher data rates in the 2.4GHz band will minimize pollution of the
band. Also, some radio parts are cheaper in the 2.4GHz at the current time; this fact combined
with the longer range of 2.4GHz products makes it a more favorable band for indoor applications.
Q. So you think it's fair to say that 2.4GHz still has economic
potential, or is all the "action" moving to 5 GHz?
A. Yes to the economic potential of 2.4GHz. The current pollution is mostly outdoors, and once
OFDM chips are inexpensive, most devices would move to them and the band's order would be restored.
This may take 5 to 10 years but it's a definite possibility.
Q. OFDM must be linearly amplified. What is the impact on link
performance on nonlinearities in the power amplifier?
A. Nonlinear amplifiers cause clipping of the signal, and some data packets would not make it
through if the system is not designed appropriately. Wi-LAN introduced phase whitening, and this
reduces the linearity requirement.
Q. Do you think that there will be chips that implement OFDM on
the merchant semiconductor market?
A. Yes. I think they'll be on the market in 2001.
Q. Are there applications for OFDM outside of IEEE 802.11a?
A. Yes -- fixed wireless access, cellular in 4G applications, home multimedia, and road access for
internet into vehicles, to name a few.
Q. What products have been developed as a result of the partnership
between Wi-LAN and Philips?
A. We jointly developed an ASIC that is used in our I.WiLL(tm) System.
Q. Does Wi-LAN have other partnerships that will lead to new
products?
A. We have signed a marketing agreement with Ercisson Canada that should lead to products
in the 2.5GHz band.
Q. What technologies do you think will be the main competitors to
OFDM for delivery of wireless broadband?
A. I do not see anything that can compete with it for the next five years.
Q. Does OFDM have the capacity to go to even higher data
rates?
A. There is no theoretical upper limit on the capacity.
Q. What do you think the future of OFDM will be?
A. Hopefully, inexpensive products that provide high speed communications to individuals and
appliances around the globe.
Q. Thank you, Dr. Zaghloul!
|